PHOENIX – Attorneys for Kari Lake entered a second day Thursday of making an attempt to construct a case for the one remaining authorized declare in her problem to the Arizona governor’s race.

A decide in suburban Phoenix is permitting Lake a three-day trial to show county election officers did not carry out greater stage signature verifications on mail-in ballots that had been flagged.

Maricopa County has a failed course of for verifying 1000’s of poll signatures that even a few of its personal staff query, her attorneys argued in courtroom Wednesday.

Lake’s legal professionals spent many of the trial’s first day displaying video and taking testimony from two earlier signature screeners who alleged election staff have been overwhelmed.

Solely certainly one of her claims has but to be dismissed in her case difficult her loss six months in the past to Democrat Katie Hobbs.

“There’s simply no way to review signatures with respect to procedures,” stated Kurt Olsen, certainly one of Lake’s attorneys.

The previous TV anchor was among the many most vocal of final 12 months’s Republican candidates selling former President Donald Trump’s election lies, which she made the centerpiece of her marketing campaign.

Lake listened to the proceedings from a seat behind the courtroom however didn’t converse. She left two hours into the listening to.

Whereas most different election deniers across the nation conceded after dropping their races in November, Lake didn’t. She misplaced to Hobbs by greater than 17,000 votes.

Courts have dismissed most of her lawsuit, however the Arizona Supreme Court docket revived one declare that challenges the implementation of signature verification procedures on early ballots in Maricopa County, house to greater than 60% of the state’s voters.

Superior Court docket Decide Peter A. Thompson stated in a ruling Monday that Lake alleges Maricopa County officers did not carry out greater stage signature verifications on mail-in ballots that had been flagged by decrease stage screeners for any inconsistencies.

In a subsequent choice, Thompson stated Lake is also difficult signature verification by decrease stage screeners, too.

The video footage proven by Lake’s authorized crew got here from a Maricopa County digital camera feed that purportedly reveals a signature verified incorrectly and unexpectedly by a employee.

Reynaldo “Rey” Valenzuela, Maricopa County director of elections, testified that the short-term employee merely did not grasp the technological abilities wanted for the job and he was re-assigned elsewhere. Signature verifiers are additionally randomly audited.

“We review them for consistency,” Valenzuela stated. “Was there some sort of inconsistency where someone did all good (signatures) or all bad?”

A lower-level employee additionally testified that higher-level signature reviewers have been overwhelmed and kicked again poll affidavit envelopes that appeared questionable.

Three staff on lower-level signature verification who filed declarations in courtroom on Lake’s behalf have stated they skilled rejection charges as a result of mismatched signatures on 15% to 40% of the ballots they encountered.

Attorneys for Arizona election officers stated the employees’ hypothesis on signature verification efforts doesn’t quantity to a violation of the regulation or misconduct by election staff — and raised questions on whether or not the three staff might know the result of the particular ballots that they had flagged.

Lake isn’t contesting whether or not voters’ signatures on poll envelopes matched these of their voting information.

In a ruling Monday evening, Thompson refused to throw out Lake’s declare.

Lake faces a excessive bar in proving not solely her allegation over signature verification efforts but in addition that it affected the result of her race.

County officers say they don’t have anything to cover and are assured that they are going to prevail in courtroom.

Lake’s legal professionals say there was a flood of mail-in ballots in Maricopa County at a time when there have been too few staff to confirm poll signatures. Her attorneys say the county in the end accepted 1000’s of ballots that had been rejected earlier by staff for having mismatched signatures.

By reviving the declare, the Arizona Supreme Court docket reversed a decrease courtroom choice that discovered Lake waited too lengthy to lift it.

Earlier in her lawsuit, Lake had centered on issues with poll printers at some polling locations in Maricopa County. The faulty printers produced ballots that have been too gentle to be learn by the on-site tabulators at polling locations. Traces have been backed up in some areas amid the confusion. Lake alleged poll printer issues have been the results of intentional misconduct.

County officers say everybody had an opportunity to vote and all ballots have been counted as a result of these affected by the printers have been taken to extra subtle counters at election headquarters.

In mid-February, the Arizona Court docket of Appeals rejected Lake’s assertions, concluding she introduced no proof that voters whose ballots have been unreadable by tabulators at polling locations have been unable to vote.

The next month, the state Supreme Court docket declined to listen to practically all of Lake’s enchantment, saying there was no proof to help her declare that greater than 35,000 ballots have been added to vote totals.

Earlier this month, the courtroom sanctioned Lake’s legal professionals $2,000 for making false statements when saying that greater than 35,000 ballots had been improperly added to the whole depend.

The trial is the second performed in Lake’s election problem.

Copyright 2023 The Related Press. All rights reserved. This materials is probably not printed, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed with out permission.